>>16916848 > Could just be a money grabbling operation now. Very probably is. I hadn't looked at Q posts in years, but the style is jarringly different now. At first, Q would ask questions >implying >implications. The style was explained as being a way to hide from surveillance. Now Q looks a lot like a news aggregator with commentary by Edward "The Riddler" Nygma.
And who else do we know of who wants a news aggregator for boomers on this very site?